| Copyright 2005-2007 Dr. Jad Khalaf, Ph.D. All Rights Reserved |
| Copyright 2005-2008 Dr. Jad Khalaf, Ph.D. All Rights Reserved |
| "Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth." II Timothy 2:15 |
| JEPHTHAH BY JAD JAMAL KHALAF The book of Judges contains very useful information about this particular part of Israel’s history. During this period of history, there had to be “adaptation and adjustment” on behalf of the people who were judged by the judges. Jephthah was a minor judge as well as “the tenth judge.” The judges had a job to do. They were in command of God’s people. There were three types of judges: warrior, priest, or prophet judge. The judges “were raised up by God to be the saviours of His oppressed people.” No one knows for sure who wrote the book of Judges but the author, without doubt, was inspired by God to write down the events that happened under the different judges. As a whole, the book of Judges is very interesting to read and study. One particular situation that contains many different opinions about is the vow that Jephthah made to the Lord in chapter eleven. First of all, there is some very useful background information that will aid in the understanding of how the vow came to be. Jephthah was born to a harlot. Even though Jephthah could not help what his mother was, this was still a sign of “disgrace" on Jephthah’s reputation. Jephthah’s brothers did not want him to receive any inheritance, so they basically drove him out from their presence. Jephthah was basically left to defend himself, without any help from his family. Jephthah left the presence of his brothers, dwelt with others who were considered useless, and later became known as a brave and strong man. That is when the Gileadites came to him. In time of trouble, they sought out the outcast Jephthah. There was no one to lead the men in fighting so they asked him to be their “commander-in-chief against the Ammonites.” Jephthah had certain conditions that must be understood before he would rule over them. He was “naturally a little sceptical at first; but agreement is reached and ratified before Jehovah" in Mizpah. The children of Ammon were going to have to war against Jephthah and his people. Jephthath advanced his men towards the Ammonites. God’s spirit had come over Jephthah during this time. God’s spirit did not come over Jephthah until “he had yielded himself to the Lord, and made full confession, by uttering all his words before the Lord.” This sounds like any other judge who judged and lead the people to war, that is till Jephthah made his vow. Jephthah made a vow to God and that vow is very interesting to read and think about. Jephthah promised God that if God would allow him to destroy the Ammonites, then he would offer a burnt offering. “What is wrong with that?” One might ask. Burnt offerings were made all of the time, right. Correct, but this vow was much different in nature. Whatever came out of the doors of Jephthah’s house, to meet him when he returned, would be the Lord’s. Jephthah was willing to offer “a sacrifice for his victory over the Ammonites.” Now the story of Jephthah and his vow takes a very interesting twist. Take a look at the vow. Some think that “Jephthah’s fulfilled vow seems to be inhuman and some cannot understand why God should be pleased with it.” There was no doubt that Jephthah worshiped God. The question arises, “What if Jephthah does defeat the Ammonites, then would Jephthah really sacrifice a human being as a burnt offering?” Sure enough, God helped Jephthah defeat the Ammonites by a great slaughter. Jephthah “is fit now to have them delivered into his hands, as he himself is now in the hands of God, that no flesh should glory in His presence.” The Israelites had demolished the Ammonites. Jephthah was excited and full of joy as he returned to his home. A celebration was going to take place, as was accustomed to the winning army. God had used this once outcast man to lead Israel back to Him. When Jephthah arrived to his home in Mizpeh, someone from his family ran out to meet him. One might guess correct if said that his daughter was the first one out of his house. Wow! Talk about Jephthah having to swallow his words whole. Jephthah’s only child was the one who came to greet him with singing and with dancing. Jephthah had opened his mouth and had inserted his foot. There was no going back on his word because a promise is a promise. Surprising, though, Jephthah’s daughter tells her dad that what has been promised must be carried out. Jephthah’s daughter knew that God had been with her father in defeating the Ammonites. There was only one request from the daughter. The daughter wanted to go up with her friends to the hills and lament her virginity. After the two months were up, Jephthah carried out his promise to Yawheh. After that, Israel’s daughters would go yearly and for four days they would lament for Jephthah’s daughter. Now that the story has been summarized, it is time to sort out and figure out everything that happened. Jephthah had made a hasty, or so it seemed, vow. He did not stop and think who might come out of his doors, or did he? One thing is for certain, Jephthah knew what he was doing when he made the vow. Custom was that the women of the house would come out to meet whoever was coming back from war. So Jephthah could have very well forgot this or might have just brushed it off. Jephthah’s words were of importance and they were to be taken seriously. His words had been “uttered before Yahweh at Mizpah.” If he was to not carry out what he had promised, then not only would his integrity have been on the line but Jephthah would have had to answer to God. God takes vows very seriously. Reading the Scripture poses the question whether or not Jephthah’s intentions were to sacrifice one of his family members or to sacrifice some kind of animal. “That a human victim is intended is, in fact, as plain as words can make it; the language is inapplicable to an animal, and a vow to offer the first sheep or goat that he comes across - not to mention the possibility of an unclean animal - is trivial to absurdity.” The vow basically vowed that whatever came out of the door of the house, so “there is no reason why this literal interpretation cannot stand.” In his vow, “Jephthah made his vow fully aware of the Israelite custom of maidens coming out to greet a victor after battle.” So, “whom it shall be it left to JHVH to designate: whoever comes first out of the house to meet the returning conqueror will be recognized by Jephthah as JHVH’s choice.” More than likely, Jepthah vowed the vow thinking in his mind that some person would surely come through the door to greet him. There are two examples of women coming to meet the victorious men coming from war. On example is Miriam, who was Aaron’s sister that danced while she had a timbrel in her hand. Another example would be the women that came out to greet David when he returned from a victorious battle. The question of whether or not Jephthah really meant to sacrifice whoever came through his door does not raise eyebrows as much as does the carrying out of the vow. Did Jephthah actually kill and slaughter his only daughter or did he do something else? Here is where the story becomes really controversial. There are a variety of views on this particular subject. Looking at different viewpoints as to what happened helps in forming an opinion. “Heathen nations of Palestine did offer human sacrifices to their false gods; but Jehovah repeatedly warned Israel not to engage in such sacrifices.” There is no doubt that “Jephthah was a God-fearing judge.” Since Jephthah had this type of characteristic, therefore, he would have known “that human sacrifices were an abomination to God, He would not be likely to countenance them.” The Israelite law condemned such actions. Interesting in itself is the idea that Jephthah was a judge that was to abide by and judge the people of Israel according to the law. How could a judge, who was raised up be God, go against the very thing that was against the law? Do not forget what a judge was to do. “The judges whom God raised up were living object-lessons by which God sought to preserve in Israel the understanding that faith in Jehovah, the only true God, was the way of victory and well-being.” Clear enough is the concept that “Israelites never practiced human sacrifice; hence Jephthah never would have intended such sacrifice in his vow and certainly would not have performed it in fulfillment.” Jephthah was excited about his victory in battle, but the victory was turned into sorrow for him. Jephthah’s daughter, however, had a different attitude concerning the vow that was made. Instead of being angry and upset with her father, Jephthah’s daughter’s “answer was most heroic.” No tears were shed and neither was there a tone of rebellion in her voice. His daughter recognized and knew that “she was to be the burnt offering her father had promised.” Instead of running from her father, Jephthah’s daughter was obedient in every sense of obedience. Jephthah’s daughter definitely had character that stood out in her. There was the request by Jephthah’s daughter. Interesting to note that his daughter desired to go and lament in the mountains. Knowing what was to take place must have been rough on the young lady. There is no doubt that the young lady was strong to her father, but this young lady must have wondered and thought about the vow time after time. Keep in mind the young lady’s request to go up to the mountains and lament her virginity. Why did she want to do this? “To a Hebrew maiden the bitterest pang was to die unwedded and childless, and so Jephthah’s daughter asks for a delay of two months that she might bewail her virginity.” By now, the father must have definitely had a broken heart. There was a possibility that this young lady would not return, but that was not very likely. For she was also true to the promise that she made. Watching her father keep the vow he made, truly was an example to his daughter. For Jephthah’s daughter was listening and watching her father. The father was true to the vow that he made and so was the daughter. “She was a woman of her word, and came back for the execution of her father’s vow.” If Jephthah’s daughter was going to die, then this death “was intended to be for the honour of God, and she would undergo it cheerfully.” The sad part on behalf of Jephthah’s daughter was the fact that she not only was her father’s only child but she was also childless. No one from that side of the family would inherit what was to be inherited at Jephthah’s death. This is what brought sadness and disappointment to the young lady. All of this will play an interesting role in the decision making process. For now, the question must continued to be answered as to the sacrifice actually taking place or not. The debate continues on. Some believe that since God did not condone human sacrifice, then Jepthah sacrificed his daughter to the Lord in a different sense. Wow! That jumps out and clings to the mind. What would a burnt offering do if nothing was killed and offered? Interesting enough, there is a possibility that Jepthah’s daughter served in the tabernacle during her entire lifetime. What does that mean and what does that have to do with a burnt offering? Why would that assumption come into play? One reason might be that Jephthah daughter remained a virgin, therefore, she was not able to marry and have a child to continue on the name. This type of view supports the fact that “Jephthah kept his daughter in sacred celibacy for the rest of her life; that what she and her female companions bewailed was not the prospect of coming sacrifice but her virginity.” In this type of opinion, Jephthah’s daughter could have very well been a nun. She was not Catholic, so how could she be a nun? A nun lives in a life that is totally surrendered to God and for His service only. So the vow could have been carried out in the sense that “the exclusion of his daughter as a kind of Old Testament nun, surrendered to live a secluded life in the service of the Tabernacle - a vestal virgin.” This type of view argues their point in several different areas. They are the following: “1) The sacrifice of children to Moloch was an abomination prohibited by an express law, and not an instance occurred of a human sacrifice to God. 2) The case of Abraham offering Isaac is not in point, as Isaac was not sacrificed. The command was given only to try Abraham’s faith. 3) No father could put even a criminal child to death without the consent of the magistrates. 4) The traditional laws of the Jews say: ‘If a Jew should devote his son or his daughter, his man servant or maid servant who are Hebrews, the devotement should be void.’” Offering up his daughter “as a spiritual burnt offering unto the Lord“ goes along with how these people think what happened to Jephthah’s daughter. The book of Leviticus, however, forbid this to happen. By the time of the judges of Israel, this was clearly a forbidden sacrifice. Since this type of practice was clearly illegal, then why would Jepthah try to please the Lord with something that went against God? There probably would not have been a priest in Israel who would have carried out this type of sacrifice. Just because a burnt offering was to be offered did not mean that death had to occur. It did mean, however, that something had to be totally and completely offered up to God. The Scripture talks about that two months after Jepthah’s daughter went to lament in the mountains, that the vow was carried out. Then the Scripture talks about Jepthah’s daughter being a virgin. Suggestion that she never got married. When Jepthah’s daughter went up to the hills to lament, it is suggested that this happened for a reason. If Jepthah’s daughter was offered up to God as a sacrifice to live and dwell in the temple, then she would not be able to have friends. She probably went with her friends so that they could enjoy each other’s company and say their final goodbyes. Israel’s daughters went up, though, four days a year to visit Jepthah’s daughters. This was probably the only time that she could see her friends. If this happened, then Jepthah mourned for a few reasons. First, he would lose his daughter. Secondly, his line would end since his daughter was to remain a virgin. Jepthah did not try to rescue his daughter, he just simply mourned for her. After mourning, Jepthah carried out what he had vowed. Some scholars say that child sacrifice was done during this time of history. Different people think that Jepthah’s vow was made in order to win God’s approval in helping him defeat the children of Ammon. Child sacrifices were practiced in Israel, though it was forbidden. Some think that when Jepthah made the vow, child sacrifice was not wrong. “Why would that be?” one might ask. During that time, the Canaanites were accustomed of offering up their children as sacrifices. “The ancient Jews who had an intimate knowledge of the customs of thier race and a unique meaning of their own language, have always understood that the daughter of Jephthah was a literal burnt offering.” So, some people believe that Jepthah’s daughter was killed for a burnt offering. Back during the days of the judges, “every man did that which was right in the sight of his own eyes and consequently it was a period of ignorance and barbarity when the sacrifice of human life was common.” This offering up of Jephthah’s daughter was, in a sense, according to these scholars an offering “offered up in emergency conditions to obtain the active cooperation of the deity.” Even before Jephthah made his vow of offering up a sacrifice, human sacrifice had been going on long before. One cannot just read this story, according to this type of view, and say that Jephthah knew what he was doing was wrong. For Jephthah could have not been aware of the type of law that forbade someone from human sacrifice. Some even say that Jephthah was unaware of the law that was found in the book of Leviticus. “A reason often given, particularly by modern scholars, for Jephthah’s ignorance of the law is the fact that he lived outside of Israel for some time.” The Israelites worshiped the Amonite god, as found in the book of Judges, before Jephthah judged the children of Israel. “A basic element in this argument is the belief that Ammonites, like others of Israel’s neighbors, regularly practiced human sacrifice in their cult. Thus it is thought, Jephthah believed that just as other gods required human sacrifice, so did Yahweh.” This view wants a person to think about the vow and to think about the sacrifice. Take for instance the sacrifice itself. Did Jephthah do a good job in sacrificing his daughter? “Some justify him in it, and think he did well, and as became one that preferred the honour of God before that which was dearest to him in this world.” The book of Hebrews mentions Jephthah as one that did great things by faith. When the Spirit of the Lord came upon him, he became an “extraordinary person.” If loving God meant sacrificing his only child, then that is exactly what Jephthah did. A promise is a promise. The verses are plain in nature and should be taken to mean exactly that, according to this view. Animals. How did they get involved in the story. Jephthah did not own a zoo and neither did he run a circus. Of course Jephthah did not do all of that, but animals can be used to suggest what was sacrificed by Jephthah. There are numerous scholars who truly believe that Jephthah intended from the beginning to sacrifice an animal. One “argument often raised by proponents of the animal theory is that parallel types of vows in other literatures show that the value of the offering was not in its weight or worth but on the fact that it was the first: whatever should be encountered first.” Whatever came out of the doors to greet him should not be taken in its literal sense, according to this view. There is no doubt that his daughter came to see her father, but the singing and the dancing was in the street. Since the street is were the parade and celebration was, then the house could have been far away. If the house was far away, then how would Jephthah know exactly what came out of his house first? “Indeed, the only type of domestic animal that could possibly come out first ahead of human beings (a dog, a donkey, a horse, or a camel) was not permitted to be sacrificed. According to Jewish tradition it was this fact alone that made Jephthah’s vow illegitimate.” Why would this be true. Some scholars suggest that there is enough evidence found to point to an animal being sacrificed instead of his daughter. By looking at the vow, these scholars that believe this say that there are different pats in the phrase that clearly suggest animal sacrifice instead of human sacrifice. “However, it should be noted that there are a number of other stories of a similar type in which the father vows the first person, not the first thing.” There have been three different viewpoints from scholars presented. Now the attention will turn to the women wailing once a year for Jephthah’s daughter. A custom was done yearly in by the Israelite women. “It became the custom for the Israelite women to observe annually a four days’ mourning for Jephthah’s daughter. - To lament] this interpretation, which is that of the ancient versions, suits the construction and context better than, commemorate, celebrate, which most modern commentators adopt.” These could have been her friends who wanted to remember Jephthah’s daughter in a special way. According to what view point is chosen, is according how the scripture is to be taken. It the viewpoint of Jephthah’s daughter being considered a “nun” who served the Lord in the Lord’s House, then the viewpoint of the Israelite women mourning for their friend can be taken this way. These women going up yearly could have been her friends who went to visit. During this visit the friends could have very well brought Jephthah’s daughter some items that were made back at home. Maybe they baked cookies or bread to bring to their friend. There was probably much things to catch up on in the social realm. It could have been both a joyous, cheerful occasion as well as a sad, depressing time in which another year would have to pass before they were to see each other. If the view point of Jephthah actually sacrificing his daughter by killing her is accepted, then the meaning of the Israelite women going up for a specific amount of days to mourn will most definitely change the meaning. There friend or relative was the one that was dead and there was a reason to go up and weep for the one that was now gone from there presence. “The majority of scholars today believe that the story about Jephthah’s daughter is etiological. It is believed that there was in Israel a festival in which the maidens participated for four days, and this story was told to explain how the festival came into existence.” There is no trace found anywhere, other than this particular place, in the Bible that talks about the festival that happened for four days each year. Some scholars believe that the festival is mythological while some believe that the fertility rites ceremony is what was really celebrated. The four days could have very well been spread out over the entire year. Maybe they were all celebrated in consecutive days. “One scholar holds that since there is an emphasis in the text on the daughter’s lamenting her virginity, the festival may have been a pre-nuptial ceremony for girls on the threshold of marriage, who would be lamenting their impending loss of virginity.” Yet there are other scholars who believe the exact opposite. They insist that the festival was for girls who were lamenting because they were not married and that they were still virgins. “Is it any wonder that the daughters of Israel remembered and honored the sacrifice of Jephthah’s daughter with a four days’ festival during each year?” Not only did the women want to just lament, but they also wanted to praise her. There must have definitely been a wonderful, yet sad feeling going through each of them. “The feelings of those Jewish maidens toward their departed companion were akin to those of the Romans toward Claelia, the virgin martyr of A.D. 280, and of other national heroines whose self-sacrifice helped their nations to victory.” The story of Jephthah and the vow that he made has always interested me. I can remember reading and hearing about this story when I was a kid. I would read it and just sit and think about what was going on and try to picture in my mind the events that took place. Recently, I was talking with an older gentleman who is a Christian. We got on the discussion of Jephthah and the vow that he made. I listened to this elderly gentleman talk. He mentioned something that was quite interesting. He told me that Jephthah must have really loved God in order to be willing to sacrifice his only daughter. I thought about what he said and we both discussed it. We departed and not many mornings later, I was listening to Dr. Adrian Rodgers preach a message about Jephthah and the vow that Jephthah made. I listened, like I always do, to this very gifted man of God. He brought out many points that was very well put. I just listened and then I read the passage again. As I was doing the research on this topic, I came across much things that was disturbing and some things that were interesting to read. I was disturbed at the fact that someone would question God’s Word, in a sense trying to prove if there was or there was not a festival that took place every year. If that is what the Bible says, then that is what it means. Secondly, I believe that the judges were raised up by God to lead His people in the correct way. These judges knew what was right and what was wrong. I believe that the law was plainly given to them and that they knew that child sacrifice was wrong in the eyes of God. There is just something inside of people that tells them that killing your own child is wrong. Who would take and slaughter their own kid. True, God told Abraham to take Isaac up and sacrifice him but God did not allow that to take place. Just like Jephthah, I believe, did not actually sacrifice his only child in a sacrificial way. I personally believe, as does Dr. Adrian Rodgers, that Jephthah gave his daughter to work for the Lord. When she went to lament with her friends, she was a virgin. After she returned and her father carried out his vow, scripture says that she remained a virgin and knew no man. How could she know no man after she had been killed. That just does not add up to me. Child sacrifice has always been and will always be wrong in the eyes of God. There is too much scripture to support that idea and the idea that she was not killed by sacrificing. Time and time again, this story is retold. Generation after generation has heard about Jephthah and his vow. Christians need to remember that whatever is promised to God is to be taken seriously. Jepthah was a man of integrity, for he kept that which he had promised. Jepthah, though, was a judge over Israel that will forever be remembered. Minor as Jephthah might have been, he will be known in major ways. BIBLIOGRAPHY John Bright, A History of Israel, 3d ed. (Philadelphia: Westminister Press, 1981). J. Vernon McGee, “Thru the Bible: Joshua” radio program (Pasadena). Eric W. Hayden, Preaching Through the Bible (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1967). Matthew Henry, Matthew Henry’s Commentary on the Whole Bible (Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson Publishers, 1991). Frederick Carl Eiselen, Edwin Lewis, and David G. Downey, The Abingdon Bible Commentary (New York: Abingdon, 1929). James Smith, Handfuls on Purpose (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdman’s Publishing Company, 1971). Lockyer, Herbert, All the Prayers of the Bible (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1959). George F. Moore, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Judges (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1966). David Marcus, Jephthah and His Vow (Lubbock: Texas Tech Press, 1986). G. F. Moore, The Book of Judges A New English Translation (London: James Clark & Co., 1898). J. Sidlow Baxter, Explore the Book (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1975). William Sanford La Sor, David Allan Hubbard, and Frederic William Bush, Old Testament Survey (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1982). Herbert Lockyer, All the Women of the Bible (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1967). |
| Dr. Jad Khalaf |